MS SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY vs UNION OF INDIA — WPMB/961/2025
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010177252025
Filing Number
WPMB/8528/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
WPMB/961/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
WRIT PETITION RELATING TO CONTRACT/TENDER MATTER ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Adv. SHAILENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
-
2.CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
-
3.CHIEF ENGINEER
-
4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
The writ petition filed by MS Sunrise Construction Company against the Union of India and Central Public Works Department was dismissed on 06.05.2026 for non-compliance with procedural defects. Despite multiple opportunities granted by the Registrar (Judicial), including a final deadline of 02.05.2026, the petitioner failed to cure the defects and remained absent during the hearing. All pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/961/2025
The writ petition filed by MS Sunrise Construction Company against the Union of India and Central Public Works Department was dismissed on 06.05.2026 for non-compliance with procedural defects. Despite multiple opportunities granted by the Registrar (Judicial), including a final deadline of 02.05.2026, the petitioner failed to cure the defects and remained absent during the hearing. All pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts