GIRISH PANULY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/755/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 143A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010177032025

Filing Number

CRLR/9186/2025

Filing Date

07-Nov-2025

Registration No

CRLR/755/2025

Registration Date

07-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

U/S 401 CODE OF CR.P.C.{CASES IN WHICH NOTICE TO ENHANCE SENTENCE/CONVICTION ISSUED(DB)} ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 143A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIRISH PANULY

    Adv. BHARAT CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.RANDEEP SINGH GREWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    In CRLR No. 755/2025, Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Girish Panuly against the State of Uttarakhand as infructuous on 06.05.2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the revision had become infructuous, and the court accordingly dismissed it without addressing the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Nov-2025

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 07-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/755/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CRLR No. 755/2025, Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Girish Panuly against the State of Uttarakhand as infructuous on 06.05.2026. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the revision had become infructuous, and the court accordingly dismissed it without addressing the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case