PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK SHANTNU GAUR, SANJAY GAUR vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (ED) Advocate - MONIKA PANT, JASMEET SINGH,BASANT SINGH — CRLA/653/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 (Act No. 36 of 1963) Section 5/14. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010174212025
Filing Number
CRLA/9043/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
CRLA/653/2025
Registration Date
03-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK SHANTNU GAUR, SANJAY GAUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (ED) Advocate - MONIKA PANT, JASMEET SINGH,BASANT SINGH
-
2.M/S MINOCHA FURNISHERS
-
3.M/S MINOCHA ELECTRONICS
-
4.SHRI SANJAY MINOCHA
-
5.SMT. RUCHIKA MINOCHA
-
6.SMT. PRAVEEN ARORA
-
7.SH. ANURAG MINOCHA
-
8.SMT. RUCHI MINOCHA
-
9.SMT. SAROJ MINOCHA,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
30-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Case Summary: CRLA 653/2025 In this Criminal Revision Application involving Punjab National Bank, Shantnu Gaur, and Sanjay Gaur against the Directorate of Enforcement, the court hearing on 30.05.2026 found that none of the parties appeared before Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani. The case was adjourned and listed for rehearing after procedural defects are cured by the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Nov-2025
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/653/2025
Case Summary: CRLA 653/2025 In this Criminal Revision Application involving Punjab National Bank, Shantnu Gaur, and Sanjay Gaur against the Directorate of Enforcement, the court hearing on 30.05.2026 found that none of the parties appeared before Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani. The case was adjourned and listed for rehearing after procedural defects are cured by the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts