DEVENDRA PRASAD LAKHERA vs DR ASHUTOSH SAYANA — CLCON/380/2024
Case under Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12. Disposed: --CLOSED on 27th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010171132024
Filing Number
CLCON/7986/2024
Filing Date
24-10-2024
Registration No
CLCON/380/2024
Registration Date
24-10-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVENDRA PRASAD LAKHERA
Adv. LATA NEGI,AMAR MURTI SHUKLA,AMAR MURTI SHUKLA, ANAND SINGH,AMAR MURTI SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
DR ASHUTOSH SAYANA
CHANDRA MOHAN SINGH RAWAT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
| 10-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 06-11-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 16-10-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 21-02-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the contempt petition after finding that the Competent Authority had complied with the previous court order by constituting a selection committee under the Regularisation Rules, 2013 to consider the petitioner's regularisation claim. Although the committee ultimately rejected the petitioner's case, the petitioner chose not to pursue the contempt matter further, leading the court to close the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the contempt petition after finding that the Competent Authority had complied with the previous court order by constituting a selection committee under the Regularisation Rules, 2013 to consider the petitioner's regularisation claim. Although the committee ultimately rejected the petitioner's case, the petitioner chose not to pursue the contempt matter further, leading the court to close the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts