IFFCO TOKIO GIC LTD H C PANDE, ,PRAMOD KUMAR BAILWAL vs SMT. RENU Advocate - NEERAJ GARG — AO/450/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010171102019

Filing Number

AO/8903/2019

Filing Date

18-Oct-2019

Registration No

AO/450/2019

Registration Date

18-Oct-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IFFCO TOKIO GIC LTD H C PANDE, ,PRAMOD KUMAR BAILWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. RENU Advocate - NEERAJ GARG

  2. 2.MASTER NAMAN

  3. 3.MASTER AMAN

  4. 4.SMT. SUSHMA

    Adv. NEERAJ GARG

  5. 5.SACHENDRA

    Adv. KARAN ANAND

  6. 6.KARANVEER CHHABARA

    Adv. KARAN ANAND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: AO/450/2019 Court Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed IFFCO TOKIO GIC Ltd.'s appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Tribunal's compensation award of Rs. 19,61,090/- to the deceased's family. The court found the car driver was solely responsible for the rash and negligent driving that caused the fatal motorcycle accident on 26.03.2016, rejecting the insurer's arguments about discrepancies in FIR vehicle details and contributory negligence by the motorcycle rider. Key Reasoning: The court relied on eyewitness testimony (PW3 Ajay Kaushal) identifying the Santro Hyundai car as the vehicle causing the collision, finding minor FIR discrepancies immaterial. The court noted the appellant presented no evidence supporting contributory negligence claims, while claimants established the car driver's sole fault through direct witnesses and medical documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  4. 21-Feb-2025

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  5. 14-Nov-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

  6. 13-Sep-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  7. 16-May-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  8. 19-Feb-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  9. 30-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  10. 30-Nov-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  11. 11-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti SharmaView PDF

  12. 11-Sep-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  13. 20-May-2023

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  14. 18-Mar-2023

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  15. 30-Nov-2022

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  16. 17-Oct-2022

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  17. 05-Sep-2022

    Order Matters -17

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  18. 11-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  19. 11-Jul-2022

    Order Matters -17

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  20. 14-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  21. 13-Jun-2022

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  22. 22-Apr-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  23. 08-Oct-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  24. 20-Nov-2019

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia

  25. 23-Oct-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu DhuliaView PDF

  26. 21-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 18-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/450/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/450/2019 Court Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed IFFCO TOKIO GIC Ltd.'s appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Tribunal's compensation award of Rs. 19,61,090/- to the deceased's family. The court found the car driver was solely responsible for the rash and negligent driving that caused the fatal motorcycle accident on 26.03.2016, rejecting the insurer's arguments about discrepancies in FIR vehicle details and contributory negligence by the motorcycle rider. Key Reasoning: The court relied on eyewitness testimony (PW3 Ajay Kaushal) identifying the Santro Hyundai car as the vehicle causing the collision, finding minor FIR discrepancies immaterial. The court noted the appellant presented no evidence supporting contributory negligence claims, while claimants established the car driver's sole fault through direct witnesses and medical documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case