DIWAN SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSB/463/2023

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010169772023

Filing Number

WPSB/7560/2023

Filing Date

17-Oct-2023

Registration No

WPSB/463/2023

Registration Date

17-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PENSION MATTER ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIWAN SINGH

    Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL

  2. 2.AMEER UDDIN

  3. 3.VIKRAM SINGH

  4. 4.VIPIN CHANDRA TIWARI

  5. 5.HARIVANSH PRASAD

  6. 6.SUBHASH RAM

  7. 7.SALHEEN

  8. 8.RAJVEER SINGH

  9. 9.PHARAJODDIN

  10. 10.FAGU

  11. 11.SUBHASH CHANDAR

  12. 12.BHURA SHAH

  13. 13.CHARAN SINGH

  14. 14.RAKESH

  15. 15.PARMANAND ROY

  16. 16.ASHARPHI LAL

  17. 17.KALLU SINGH

  18. 18.JAYPAL SINGH

  19. 19.RAMESH

  20. 20.PREM SINGH

  21. 21.RISHIPAL

  22. 22.OMPAL

  23. 23.MOHD YUNUS

  24. 24.VIJAYPAL

  25. 25.DEVI DUTT TEWARI

  26. 26.KISHAN

  27. 27.CHANDRIKA

  28. 28.TEJ RAM

  29. 29.KHUSHAL SINGH

  30. 30.SMT RADHIKA DEVI

  31. 31.BALAM SINGH

  32. 32.SMT HEMA DEVI

  33. 33.BAHADUR SINGH

  34. 34.JWALA DATT BUDHANI

  35. 35.GOPAL SINGH

  36. 36.BALA DATT

  37. 37.KUBER SINGH

  38. 38.NARENDRA PANDEY

  39. 39.NAND RAM

  40. 40.BALAM SINGH

  41. 41.TRILOK SINGH

  42. 42.KHEEM SINGH RAWAT

  43. 43.POORAN SINGH

  44. 44.MATHURA DATT

  45. 45.PURAN SINGH

  46. 46.SMT GANGA DEVI

  47. 47.DEVI DATT PAPNAI

  48. 48.LAL SINGH

  49. 49.TARA SINGH

  50. 50.GANESH SINGH

  51. 51.SHER RAM

  52. 52.KHADAK SINGH

  53. 53.DIWAN SINGH

  54. 54.DHAM SINGH

  55. 55.PARAMANAND

  56. 56.NARAYAN SINGH

  57. 57.HAYAT SINGH

  58. 58.KASHI RAM

  59. 59.RAMESH CHANDRA

  60. 60.BACHI SINGH

  61. 61.SMT LACHHIMA DEVI

  62. 62.MANGAL SINGH

  63. 63.SMT REVATI DEVI

  64. 64.LALIT SINGH

  65. 65.MADHO SINGH

  66. 66.MANGAL SINGH

  67. 67.BIPIN CHANDRA

  68. 68.MOHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.SECRETARY FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.SECRETARY LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS SECRETARATE VIDHAN SABHA

  4. 4.ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF HEAD OF DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT

    Adv. C.S.C.

  5. 5.CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

    Adv. C.S.C.

  6. 6.CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HALDWANI

    Adv. C.S.C.

  7. 7.DIRECTOR LEKHA EVAM HAQDARI

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Summary of WPSB/463/2023 The court allowed the petitioners' miscellaneous application to place a rejoinder affidavit on record. The State argued that service condition petitions should be referred to the Public Service Tribunal under the U.P. Public Service (Tribunals) Act, 1976, citing recent Supreme Court judgment. The case challenges the validity of the Uttarakhand Qualifying Service for Pension and Validation Act, 2022. The court adjourned the matter for listing together with related petitions, including WPSB No.63 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr Justice G. Narendar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr Justice G. Narendar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  12. 28-Jul-2025

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  14. 05-May-2025

    Service Matters -82

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  15. 21-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  16. 21-Mar-2025

    Admission Matters (After Fresh) -30

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  17. 21-Nov-2024

    Admission Matters (After Fresh) -30

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  18. 09-Sep-2024

    Admission Matters (After Fresh) -30

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  19. 21-Aug-2024

    Admission Matters (After Fresh) -30

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  20. 02-Aug-2024

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  21. 10-May-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  22. 18-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 17-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSB/463/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPSB/463/2023 The court allowed the petitioners' miscellaneous application to place a rejoinder affidavit on record. The State argued that service condition petitions should be referred to the Public Service Tribunal under the U.P. Public Service (Tribunals) Act, 1976, citing recent Supreme Court judgment. The case challenges the validity of the Uttarakhand Qualifying Service for Pension and Validation Act, 2022. The court adjourned the matter for listing together with related petitions, including WPSB No.63 of 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case