MOHAN SWAROOP ALIAS MUNISH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/2040/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010168732025
Filing Number
BA1/8743/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
BA1/2040/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING THE TRIAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAN SWAROOP ALIAS MUNISH
Adv. VIKAS PANDE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-10-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 17-04-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 04-04-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 18-03-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 10-02-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
Orders
Case BA1/2040/2025 Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted regular bail to Mohan Swaroop alias Munish, who was accused of rape under Section 65(1) BNS and POCSO Act. The court found that key witnesses including the victim and medical examiner had already been examined, substantially reducing the risk of evidence tampering, and noted the complainant did not support the prosecution's case in material aspects. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties after serving custody since March 11, 2025, with no criminal antecedents or absconding risk evident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case BA1/2040/2025 Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted regular bail to Mohan Swaroop alias Munish, who was accused of rape under Section 65(1) BNS and POCSO Act. The court found that key witnesses including the victim and medical examiner had already been examined, substantially reducing the risk of evidence tampering, and noted the complainant did not support the prosecution's case in material aspects. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties after serving custody since March 11, 2025, with no criminal antecedents or absconding risk evident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts