SAGEER AHMAD O, MANJU BAHUGUNA (AMICUS CURIAE) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRJA/53/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376(KA)(KHA),376(2)(DHA),506. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010166372025
Filing Number
CRJA/8620/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
CRJA/53/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAGEER AHMAD O, MANJU BAHUGUNA (AMICUS CURIAE)
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDER MATTERS -17
ORDER MATTERS -17
ORDER MATTERS -17
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-10-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 25-02-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 16-02-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 15-12-2025 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 21-11-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: CRJA/53/2025 Court Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Sageer Ahmad's criminal appeal and upheld his conviction under POCSO Act Sections 6 and 18, affirming his 10-year rigorous imprisonment and ₹25,000 fine. The court found the victim's testimony credible, supported by electronic evidence (video recordings), and held that absence of medical injuries is not fatal in child sexual abuse cases. Key Reasoning: The court prioritized the minor victim's consistent testimony as the primary basis for conviction, noting that victim testimony alone suffices under POCSO if found reliable. Minor inconsistencies in the father's testimony did not demolish the prosecution case. The court found the electronic evidence and surrounding circumstances (appellant's access to premises as milk supplier) corroborative, and rejected arguments about chain-of-custody defects, Section 65-B compliance issues, and lack of medical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRJA/53/2025 Court Decision: The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Sageer Ahmad's criminal appeal and upheld his conviction under POCSO Act Sections 6 and 18, affirming his 10-year rigorous imprisonment and ₹25,000 fine. The court found the victim's testimony credible, supported by electronic evidence (video recordings), and held that absence of medical injuries is not fatal in child sexual abuse cases. Key Reasoning: The court prioritized the minor victim's consistent testimony as the primary basis for conviction, noting that victim testimony alone suffices under POCSO if found reliable. Minor inconsistencies in the father's testimony did not demolish the prosecution case. The court found the electronic evidence and surrounding circumstances (appellant's access to premises as milk supplier) corroborative, and rejected arguments about chain-of-custody defects, Section 65-B compliance issues, and lack of medical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts