KAFEEL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /589/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 302/34. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010159372024

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA /8477/2024

Filing Date

04-10-2024

Registration No

CRLA /589/2024

Registration Date

04-10-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

LIFE IMPRISONMENT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 302/34

Petitioner(s)

KAFEEL

Adv. ANKURIT RAJ DAVID

IDRISH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

07-10-2024

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

24-03-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

23-03-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

24-02-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

18-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

24-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand rejected the bail application of Kafeel and Idrish, who were convicted under Sections 302 read with 34 IPC for the murder of Shadaab in a road-side dispute using a hammer and iron rod. The court found sufficient evidence through witness PW3 Shahzad's testimony and post-mortem report supporting the prosecution case, concluding it was not a fit case for bail. The matter has been listed for final hearing on 13.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand rejected the bail application of Kafeel and Idrish, who were convicted under Sections 302 read with 34 IPC for the murder of Shadaab in a road-side dispute using a hammer and iron rod. The court found sufficient evidence through witness PW3 Shahzad's testimony and post-mortem report supporting the prosecution case, concluding it was not a fit case for bail. The matter has been listed for final hearing on 13.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case