RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C482/1820/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 323. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010157752021
Filing Number
C482/9031/2021
Filing Date
14-12-2021
Registration No
C482/1820/2021
Registration Date
14-12-2021
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL
Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
RAMA SHAH
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-12-2021 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: C482/1820/2021 The court allowed the compounding application and quashed the criminal proceedings against school principal Rajnish Chandra Juyal and other school employees. The case arose from an altercation over a student's ineligibility to appear in board exams due to insufficient attendance, resulting in an FIR under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506. After the complainant and applicants reached an amicable settlement and filed affidavits confirming compromise, the court permitted compounding of the non-compoundable offences citing Supreme Court precedent that continuation would cause prejudice when conviction is remote. The entire Criminal Case No. 70 of 2020, FIR, and charge-sheet were quashed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C482/1820/2021 The court allowed the compounding application and quashed the criminal proceedings against school principal Rajnish Chandra Juyal and other school employees. The case arose from an altercation over a student's ineligibility to appear in board exams due to insufficient attendance, resulting in an FIR under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506. After the complainant and applicants reached an amicable settlement and filed affidavits confirming compromise, the court permitted compounding of the non-compoundable offences citing Supreme Court precedent that continuation would cause prejudice when conviction is remote. The entire Criminal Case No. 70 of 2020, FIR, and charge-sheet were quashed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts