NITIN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL /1367/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,420,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010157422023

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPCRL /8714/2023

Filing Date

26-09-2023

Registration No

WPCRL /1367/2023

Registration Date

26-09-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,420,504,506

Petitioner(s)

NITIN

Adv. DEEP CHANDRA JOSHI

MANISH KUMAR

RAHUL ALIAS KULDEEP

Adv. M S DHAPOLA ,NANDAN ARYA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

MAUSAM SINGH

Adv. ALOK KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

27-09-2023

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

13-03-2025

FOR FINAL HEARING -40

16-02-2024

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Summary: In WPCRL No. 1367 of 2023, Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the underlying investigation had already been completed and a closure report had been filed, rendering the petition's subject matter moot. Accordingly, the court found no purpose in continuing the proceedings and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPCRL No. 1367 of 2023, Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the underlying investigation had already been completed and a closure report had been filed, rendering the petition's subject matter moot. Accordingly, the court found no purpose in continuing the proceedings and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case