LAKHWINDAR SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/586/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,20. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010155342025

Filing Number

CRLA/8000/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

CRLA/586/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHWINDAR SINGH

    Adv. HARSH VARDHAN DHANIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed bail applications for appellants Bhagwan Devi and Lakhwindar Singh, who were convicted under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found procedural irregularities in the case—specifically, that the sample seal bore an FIR number despite being prepared before the FIR was lodged—and suspended the execution of their sentences pending appeal. Both appellants are released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Nov-2025

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/586/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed bail applications for appellants Bhagwan Devi and Lakhwindar Singh, who were convicted under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found procedural irregularities in the case—specifically, that the sample seal bore an FIR number despite being prepared before the FIR was lodged—and suspended the execution of their sentences pending appeal. Both appellants are released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case