LAKHWINDAR SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /586/2025

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,20. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010155342025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA /8000/2025

Filing Date

26-09-2025

Registration No

CRLA /586/2025

Registration Date

26-09-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8,20

Petitioner(s)

LAKHWINDAR SINGH

Adv. HARSH VARDHAN DHANIK

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

26-11-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

07-10-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed bail applications for appellants Bhagwan Devi and Lakhwindar Singh, who were convicted under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found procedural irregularities in the case—specifically, that the sample seal bore an FIR number despite being prepared before the FIR was lodged—and suspended the execution of their sentences pending appeal. Both appellants are released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed bail applications for appellants Bhagwan Devi and Lakhwindar Singh, who were convicted under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found procedural irregularities in the case—specifically, that the sample seal bore an FIR number despite being prepared before the FIR was lodged—and suspended the execution of their sentences pending appeal. Both appellants are released on bail upon furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case