FATE SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/648/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010152392023
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
CRLA/8431/2023
Filing Date
19-09-2023
Registration No
CRLA/648/2023
Registration Date
19-09-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FATE SINGH
Adv. SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL,REITUPARNA JOSHI,REITUPARNA JOSHI, REITUPARNA JOSHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-09-2023 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 29-06-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 24-10-2024 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 26-06-2024 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 12-06-2024 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
In CRLA No. 648/2023, the High Court of Uttarakhand (Judges Ravindra Maithani and Siddhartha Sah) adjourned the hearing at the request of the appellant's counsel. The case was listed for further hearing on 29.06.2026. No substantive order on merits was passed on this date (19.05.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In CRLA No. 648/2023, the High Court of Uttarakhand (Judges Ravindra Maithani and Siddhartha Sah) adjourned the hearing at the request of the appellant's counsel. The case was listed for further hearing on 29.06.2026. No substantive order on merits was passed on this date (19.05.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts