JAI PAL SINGH vs UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI — WPSS/1831/2024

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd September 2024.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010150602024

Filing Number

WPSS/7033/2024

Filing Date

20-Sep-2024

Registration No

WPSS/1831/2024

Registration Date

20-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MISC ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23-Sep-2024

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI PAL SINGH

    Adv. SACHIN KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTARAKHAND TRANSPORT CORPORATION Advocate - ASHISH JOSHI

  2. 2.REGIONAL MANAGER (OPERATION)

    Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

  3. 3.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE

    Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

  4. 4.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER

    Adv. ASHISH JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

    The court adjourned the case after learning that the petitioner Jai Pal Singh has passed away. The respondent's counsel sought time to take necessary steps regarding the death of the petitioner. The case was listed for hearing after four weeks to allow the respondent to proceed appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

  4. 23-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

  5. 23-Sep-2024

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

  6. 20-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1831/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court adjourned the case after learning that the petitioner Jai Pal Singh has passed away. The respondent's counsel sought time to take necessary steps regarding the death of the petitioner. The case was listed for hearing after four weeks to allow the respondent to proceed appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case