ISHRAR K.R.GAZI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/629/2023

Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Act No. 33 of 1989) Section 14. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010149682023

Filing Number

CRLA/8278/2023

Filing Date

14-Sep-2023

Registration No

CRLA/629/2023

Registration Date

14-Sep-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Act No. 33 of 1989) Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHRAR K.R.GAZI

  2. 2.INTAZAR

  3. 3.ALIZAN @ BHURA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT MUSKAN

    Adv. SHARIQ KHURSHID (LEGAL AID)

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jul-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLA 629/2023 Outcome: Criminal appeal admitted; trial court's charge framing order stayed pending further hearing on 20.07.2026. Key Finding: The court found merit in appellants' contention that the victim, having converted from Hinduism to Islam and obtained Muslim OBC widow benefits, cannot claim Scheduled Caste status under Clause 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Consequently, charges under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), and 3(1)(w)(i) cannot be sustained, as the trial court failed to consider this legal effect of conversion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  11. 16-Oct-2024

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  12. 02-Aug-2024

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  13. 16-May-2024

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  14. 01-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  15. 05-Dec-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  16. 05-Dec-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  17. 04-Dec-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  18. 08-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti SharmaView PDF

  19. 08-Nov-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  20. 02-Nov-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  21. 19-Oct-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  22. 17-Oct-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  23. 17-Oct-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  24. 26-Sep-2023

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma

  25. 20-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  26. 18-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 14-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/629/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLA 629/2023 Outcome: Criminal appeal admitted; trial court's charge framing order stayed pending further hearing on 20.07.2026. Key Finding: The court found merit in appellants' contention that the victim, having converted from Hinduism to Islam and obtained Muslim OBC widow benefits, cannot claim Scheduled Caste status under Clause 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Consequently, charges under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), and 3(1)(w)(i) cannot be sustained, as the trial court failed to consider this legal effect of conversion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case