ISHRAR K.R.GAZI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/629/2023
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Act No. 33 of 1989) Section 14. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010149682023
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
CRLA/8278/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
CRLA/629/2023
Registration Date
14-09-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ISHRAR K.R.GAZI
INTAZAR
ALIZAN @ BHURA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SMT MUSKAN
Adv. SHARIQ KHURSHID (LEGAL AID)
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-09-2023 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 20-07-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 07-05-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 02-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 11-03-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Case Summary: CRLA 629/2023 Outcome: Criminal appeal admitted; trial court's charge framing order stayed pending further hearing on 20.07.2026. Key Finding: The court found merit in appellants' contention that the victim, having converted from Hinduism to Islam and obtained Muslim OBC widow benefits, cannot claim Scheduled Caste status under Clause 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Consequently, charges under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), and 3(1)(w)(i) cannot be sustained, as the trial court failed to consider this legal effect of conversion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRLA 629/2023 Outcome: Criminal appeal admitted; trial court's charge framing order stayed pending further hearing on 20.07.2026. Key Finding: The court found merit in appellants' contention that the victim, having converted from Hinduism to Islam and obtained Muslim OBC widow benefits, cannot claim Scheduled Caste status under Clause 3 of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950. Consequently, charges under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), and 3(1)(w)(i) cannot be sustained, as the trial court failed to consider this legal effect of conversion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts