LAKSHYA SAHAI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — SPLA/229/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010144482025
Filing Number
SPLA/7422/2025
Filing Date
11-Sep-2025
Registration No
SPLA/229/2025
Registration Date
11-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKSHYA SAHAI
Adv. MAHENDRA SINGH RAWAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SANDEEP PRASAD UNIYAL
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Case Summary: SPLA 229/2025 The case was adjourned to 03.07.2026. The court directed appellant's counsel to take fresh steps for serving notice on Respondent No. 2 (Sandeep Prasad Uniyal) through all available modes, including publication, as previous service attempts remained unsuccessful. Earlier non-compliance with service directions was noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
04-May-2026
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
02-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. SPLA/229/2025
Case Summary: SPLA 229/2025 The case was adjourned to 03.07.2026. The court directed appellant's counsel to take fresh steps for serving notice on Respondent No. 2 (Sandeep Prasad Uniyal) through all available modes, including publication, as previous service attempts remained unsuccessful. Earlier non-compliance with service directions was noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts