UTTARAKHAND FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TUSHAR UPADHYAYA vs GHANANAND PARGAI Advocate - SANJAY BHATT — SPA/289/2025

Case under Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010144292025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

SPA/7021/2025

Filing Date

11-09-2025

Registration No

SPA/289/2025

Registration Date

11-09-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

UTTARAKHAND FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TUSHAR UPADHYAYA

REGIONAL MANAGER

DIVISIONAL SALES MANAGER

Respondent(s)

GHANANAND PARGAI Advocate - SANJAY BHATT

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. C.S.C.

SECRETARY

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

22-12-2025

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

10-06-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case SPA/289/2025 Summary: In this special appeal by Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation against Ghananand Pargai and others, the court (Hon'ble Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Subhash Upadhyay) adjourned the case on 10.06.2026. The appellant's counsel was granted time to supply a second set of the writ petition and pleadings. The matter was listed for hearing after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case SPA/289/2025 Summary: In this special appeal by Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation against Ghananand Pargai and others, the court (Hon'ble Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Subhash Upadhyay) adjourned the case on 10.06.2026. The appellant's counsel was granted time to supply a second set of the writ petition and pleadings. The matter was listed for hearing after one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case