SANDEEP SINGH CHAUHAN RAJVEER SINGH, SUMAN SHARMA,ABHISHEK VERMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR /632/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (act No. 2 of 1974) Section 125. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010142802024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
CRLR /7612/2024
Filing Date
06-09-2024
Registration No
CRLR /632/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
U/S 125 CR.P.C. 1973 {REVISION AGAINST THE ORDERS PASSED U/S 125 CR.P.C.} ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANDEEP SINGH CHAUHAN RAJVEER SINGH, SUMAN SHARMA,ABHISHEK VERMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SMT. NISHA ALIAS SWATI
Adv. SAGAR KOTHARI,VAISHNAVI R IYER
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 | |
| 24-03-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 | |
| 23-03-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 | |
| 16-03-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 | |
| 12-02-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
Summary: In CRLR No. 632 of 2024, the revisionist offered Rs. 20 lakhs as permanent alimony to settle the divorce by mutual consent, which the respondent/wife initially agreed to but later requested additional time to reconsider. The court adjourned the matter to 02.04.2026 and noted the alimony proposal on record, observing that the couple has lived separately for over five years constituting a dead marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In CRLR No. 632 of 2024, the revisionist offered Rs. 20 lakhs as permanent alimony to settle the divorce by mutual consent, which the respondent/wife initially agreed to but later requested additional time to reconsider. The court adjourned the matter to 02.04.2026 and noted the alimony proposal on record, observing that the couple has lived separately for over five years constituting a dead marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts