KUNAL SINGH RANA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /523/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,366,376D,506. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010139872025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA /7172/2025
Filing Date
04-09-2025
Registration No
CRLA /523/2025
Registration Date
04-09-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KUNAL SINGH RANA
Adv. SACHIN VEER SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-09-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 | |
| 08-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 06-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 11-12-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to appellant Kunal Singh Rana in a post-conviction bail application in Criminal Appeal No. 523 of 2025. The appellant was convicted under IPC Sections 366, 323, 376D, and 506 for rape and related offenses; however, the court found that the victim did not know the appellant and his identification lacked proper procedure (no Test Identification Parade was conducted). The court suspended the sentence during the appeal pendency and released the appellant on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to appellant Kunal Singh Rana in a post-conviction bail application in Criminal Appeal No. 523 of 2025. The appellant was convicted under IPC Sections 366, 323, 376D, and 506 for rape and related offenses; however, the court found that the victim did not know the appellant and his identification lacked proper procedure (no Test Identification Parade was conducted). The court suspended the sentence during the appeal pendency and released the appellant on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts