NAVEEN PATWAL vs SMT. ANANDI DEVI Advocate - MAYANK JOSHI — FA /161/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (act No. 25 of 1955) Section 28. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010137532024

Next Hearing

22nd May 2026

Filing Number

FA /6385/2024

Filing Date

02-09-2024

Registration No

FA /161/2024

Registration Date

02-09-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 19 OF FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Act No. 25 of 1955) Section 28
Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. 66 of 1984) Section 19

Petitioner(s)

NAVEEN PATWAL

Adv. BHAGWAT MEHRA

Respondent(s)

SMT. ANANDI DEVI Advocate - MAYANK JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

03-09-2024

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

22-05-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

23-04-2026

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

26-08-2025

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

05-08-2025

Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

Orders

23-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Summary: In FA No. 161 of 2024, the High Court case was adjourned for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Both parties are directed to appear before the High Court A.D.R. Centre Counsellor at Nainital on 06.05.2026 for amicable settlement negotiations. The appellant must pay Rs. 10,000 to the respondent for travel expenses, with the Counsellor's report to be filed within two weeks and the case listed again on 22.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In FA No. 161 of 2024, the High Court case was adjourned for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Both parties are directed to appear before the High Court A.D.R. Centre Counsellor at Nainital on 06.05.2026 for amicable settlement negotiations. The appellant must pay Rs. 10,000 to the respondent for travel expenses, with the Counsellor's report to be filed within two weeks and the case listed again on 22.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case