NAVEEN PATWAL vs SMT. ANANDI DEVI Advocate - MAYANK JOSHI — FA/161/2024

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Act No. 25 of 1955) Section 28. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

Next hearing 22-May-2026

CNR: UKHC010137532024

Filing Number

FA/6385/2024

Filing Date

02-Sep-2024

Registration No

FA/161/2024

Registration Date

02-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 19 OF FAMILY COURT ACT 1984 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Act No. 25 of 1955) Section 28
Family Courts Act, 1984 (Act No. 66 of 1984) Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVEEN PATWAL

    Adv. BHAGWAT MEHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ANANDI DEVI Advocate - MAYANK JOSHI

Case History

  1. 22-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Summary: In FA No. 161 of 2024, the High Court case was adjourned for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Both parties are directed to appear before the High Court A.D.R. Centre Counsellor at Nainital on 06.05.2026 for amicable settlement negotiations. The appellant must pay Rs. 10,000 to the respondent for travel expenses, with the Counsellor's report to be filed within two weeks and the case listed again on 22.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  6. 26-Aug-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  7. 05-Aug-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  8. 08-Jul-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  9. 04-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  10. 04-Jun-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  11. 24-Apr-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  12. 11-Mar-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr Justice G. Narendar , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  13. 18-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Mr Justice G. Narendar,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  14. 18-Feb-2025

    Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  15. 07-Nov-2024

    Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  16. 03-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  17. 03-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 02-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/161/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In FA No. 161 of 2024, the High Court case was adjourned for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Both parties are directed to appear before the High Court A.D.R. Centre Counsellor at Nainital on 06.05.2026 for amicable settlement negotiations. The appellant must pay Rs. 10,000 to the respondent for travel expenses, with the Counsellor's report to be filed within two weeks and the case listed again on 22.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case