SHIRSTI SHAH vs RAVI NATH RAMAN — CLCON/423/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010134832025
Filing Number
CLCON/6602/2025
Filing Date
27-08-2025
Registration No
CLCON/423/2025
Registration Date
27-08-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIRSTI SHAH
Adv. TAPAN SINGH,PITAMBAR SINGH,PITAMBAR SINGH, ,AVNEESH KUMAR,NIKHIL KUSHWAHA,PITAMBAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
RAVI NATH RAMAN
SHRI NAGENDRA BARTHWAL
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-08-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 06-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 09-01-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
| 18-12-2025 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
Orders
Summary of CLCON/423/2025 The court dismissed Shirsti Shah's contempt petition as infructuous after the State informed the court that Shah had been granted appointment under the dying-in-harness quota, thereby complying with the underlying court order. Since the petitioner did not dispute this submission and the relief sought had been granted, no live issue remained for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CLCON/423/2025 The court dismissed Shirsti Shah's contempt petition as infructuous after the State informed the court that Shah had been granted appointment under the dying-in-harness quota, thereby complying with the underlying court order. Since the petitioner did not dispute this submission and the relief sought had been granted, no live issue remained for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts