HARJINDER PAL SINGH vs CANTONMENT BOARD Advocate - BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI — ARBAP/49/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No. 26 of 1996) Section 11(6). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010134142025
Filing Number
ARBAP/6570/2025
Filing Date
27-Aug-2025
Registration No
ARBAP/49/2025
Registration Date
27-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
ARBITRATION APPLICATION(SECTION-11) ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARJINDER PAL SINGH
Adv. PRIYANSHU GAIROLA,T.S Bindra,T.S Bindra, ,T.S Bindra
Respondent(s)
-
1.CANTONMENT BOARD Advocate - BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: ARBAP/49/2025 The court granted the application to appoint a substitute arbitrator. The original arbitrator, Justice B.C. Kandpal (retired), had died on 26.11.2024. The court proposed Justice Rajesh Tandon (retired) as substitute arbitrator, with his consent and disclosures to be obtained within four weeks. Arbitration proceedings will continue from their current stage, with the matter to return before the court for further orders thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr Justice G. NarendarView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
27-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. ARBAP/49/2025
Case Summary: ARBAP/49/2025 The court granted the application to appoint a substitute arbitrator. The original arbitrator, Justice B.C. Kandpal (retired), had died on 26.11.2024. The court proposed Justice Rajesh Tandon (retired) as substitute arbitrator, with his consent and disclosures to be obtained within four weeks. Arbitration proceedings will continue from their current stage, with the matter to return before the court for further orders thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts