RAJESH ALIAS RAJESH SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/1564/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(4). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010132992025
Filing Number
BA1/6781/2025
Filing Date
26-08-2025
Registration No
BA1/1564/2025
Registration Date
26-08-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
19th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH ALIAS RAJESH SINGH
Adv. SHUBHAM PANDEY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-08-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 25-02-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 09-01-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 29-12-2025 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 28-11-2025 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
Orders
Case Summary: BA1/1564/2025 Rajesh Singh's bail application for alleged sexual assault of an 8-year-old victim under POCSO Act and BNS 2023 was rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence connecting the applicant to the offence, including the victim's consistent statements recorded under BNS and her sworn testimony before the trial court corroborating the prosecution case. The court rejected the applicant's claim of false implication due to matrimonial discord as a matter for trial, and determined that custodial detention was necessary given the heinousness of the offence, victim's tender age, and witness protection concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA1/1564/2025 Rajesh Singh's bail application for alleged sexual assault of an 8-year-old victim under POCSO Act and BNS 2023 was rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence connecting the applicant to the offence, including the victim's consistent statements recorded under BNS and her sworn testimony before the trial court corroborating the prosecution case. The court rejected the applicant's claim of false implication due to matrimonial discord as a matter for trial, and determined that custodial detention was necessary given the heinousness of the offence, victim's tender age, and witness protection concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts