SUDHANSHU MISHRA vs SRI DILIP UPADHYAI Advocate - NARENDRA BALI — C528/281/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010130222024
Filing Number
C528/6981/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
C528/281/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 138 N.I. ACT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUDHANSHU MISHRA
Adv. RAMJI SHRIVASTAVA,N K ADHIKARI,N K ADHIKARI, N K ADHIKARI
Respondent(s)
SRI DILIP UPADHYAI Advocate - NARENDRA BALI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -24
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -24
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-08-2024 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 10-10-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 03-09-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -24 |
| 11-08-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -24 |
Orders
The court dismissed Sudhanshu Mishra's application to quash cheque dishonour proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant challenged a summoning order in a case involving a dishonoured cheque of Rs. 48,75,000, arguing no enforceable liability existed. The court found the complaint properly filed after fulfilling all statutory prerequisites and found no infirmity in the Judicial Magistrate's summoning order, upholding the underlying criminal case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed Sudhanshu Mishra's application to quash cheque dishonour proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant challenged a summoning order in a case involving a dishonoured cheque of Rs. 48,75,000, arguing no enforceable liability existed. The court found the complaint properly filed after fulfilling all statutory prerequisites and found no infirmity in the Judicial Magistrate's summoning order, upholding the underlying criminal case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts