SANDEEP RAY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,LALIT SHARMA,SURAIYA NAAZ — CRLA /462/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,307,302. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010128922024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA /6911/2024
Filing Date
16-08-2024
Registration No
CRLA /462/2024
Registration Date
16-08-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
LIFE IMPRISONMENT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANDEEP RAY
Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, KUNDAN SINGH,MILIND RAJ
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,LALIT SHARMA,SURAIYA NAAZ
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-08-2024 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 18-09-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 04-09-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 19-06-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 | |
| 05-06-2025 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
Outcome Summary: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of Sandeep Ray, who was convicted under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 406 for a 2016 incident involving a death. The court suspended his sentence pending appeal, citing significant inconsistencies: the initial post-mortem and inquest reports recorded the death as accidental, yet the FIR was filed hours later charging him with murder and attempt to murder under alleged political pressure. The appellant was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties pending the appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Outcome Summary: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of Sandeep Ray, who was convicted under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 406 for a 2016 incident involving a death. The court suspended his sentence pending appeal, citing significant inconsistencies: the initial post-mortem and inquest reports recorded the death as accidental, yet the FIR was filed hours later charging him with murder and attempt to murder under alleged political pressure. The appellant was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties pending the appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts