SANDEEP RAY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,LALIT SHARMA,SURAIYA NAAZ — CRLA /462/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,307,302. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010128922024

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA /6911/2024

Filing Date

16-08-2024

Registration No

CRLA /462/2024

Registration Date

16-08-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

LIFE IMPRISONMENT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,307,302

Petitioner(s)

SANDEEP RAY

Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, KUNDAN SINGH,MILIND RAJ

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A., ,LALIT SHARMA,SURAIYA NAAZ

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

20-08-2024

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

18-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

04-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

19-06-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

05-06-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

01-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Outcome Summary: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of Sandeep Ray, who was convicted under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 406 for a 2016 incident involving a death. The court suspended his sentence pending appeal, citing significant inconsistencies: the initial post-mortem and inquest reports recorded the death as accidental, yet the FIR was filed hours later charging him with murder and attempt to murder under alleged political pressure. The appellant was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties pending the appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Outcome Summary: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of Sandeep Ray, who was convicted under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 406 for a 2016 incident involving a death. The court suspended his sentence pending appeal, citing significant inconsistencies: the initial post-mortem and inquest reports recorded the death as accidental, yet the FIR was filed hours later charging him with murder and attempt to murder under alleged political pressure. The appellant was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties pending the appeal hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case