MITESH VIJAY KADAM vs INTERNATIONAL HERBAL CORPORATION PVT. LTD. Advocate - JAI KRISHNA PANDEY — C528/1236/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010114002025

Next Hearing

20th May 2026

Filing Number

C528/5775/2025

Filing Date

23-07-2025

Registration No

C528/1236/2025

Registration Date

23-07-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 138 N.I. ACT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138

Petitioner(s)

MITESH VIJAY KADAM

Adv. GAURAV SINGH,SUSHEEL KUMAR,SUSHEEL KUMAR, ,SUSHEEL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

INTERNATIONAL HERBAL CORPORATION PVT. LTD. Advocate - JAI KRISHNA PANDEY

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

25-07-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

20-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

11-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

16-03-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

16-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

Orders

17-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: In C528/1236/2025 between Mitesh Vijay Kadam and International Herbal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., the court (Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.) granted three weeks' time to the applicant's counsel to file a rejoinder affidavit. The case is adjourned to 11.05.2026, with any interim orders continuing until that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In C528/1236/2025 between Mitesh Vijay Kadam and International Herbal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., the court (Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.) granted three weeks' time to the applicant's counsel to file a rejoinder affidavit. The case is adjourned to 11.05.2026, with any interim orders continuing until that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case