RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD vs LATA BHATT Advocate - SANJAY BHATT, ,PREM PRAKASH BHATT — AO/256/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010113092025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
AO/5589/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
AO/256/2025
Registration Date
22-07-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Adv. BHARAT TEWARI,PULAK AGARWAL,PULAK AGARWAL, ,PULAK AGARWAL
Respondent(s)
LATA BHATT Advocate - SANJAY BHATT, ,PREM PRAKASH BHATT
AKSHAY KUMAR BHATT
Adv. SANJAY BHATT,PREM PRAKASH BHATT
ANIL SINGH
Adv. NAVEEN SINGH BISHT
PRAKASH CHANDRA NAINWAL
Adv. NAVEEN SINGH BISHT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ADMISSION MATTERS -35
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-06-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 07-11-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -35 |
| 19-09-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: AO/256/2025 In this appeal by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd against an award granting compensation to claimants Lata Bhatt and Akshay Kumar Bhatt, a Money Withdrawal Application (IA No.2 of 2026) was heard on 08.05.2026. The court rejected the claimants' request to withdraw awarded compensation, finding insufficient justification given that respondent no.1 is an Assistant Teacher and respondent no.2 is a Tehsildar (both employed positions). The case was adjourned for final hearing on 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: AO/256/2025 In this appeal by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd against an award granting compensation to claimants Lata Bhatt and Akshay Kumar Bhatt, a Money Withdrawal Application (IA No.2 of 2026) was heard on 08.05.2026. The court rejected the claimants' request to withdraw awarded compensation, finding insufficient justification given that respondent no.1 is an Assistant Teacher and respondent no.2 is a Tehsildar (both employed positions). The case was adjourned for final hearing on 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts