MANSI CHAUHAN vs SACHIN KUMAR Advocate - SANJEEV SINGH, ,RINKESH RAWAT,SANJAY BHATT — CRLR/457/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 125. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010110522025
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
CRLR/5577/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
CRLR/457/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
U/S 125 CR.P.C. 1973 {REVISION AGAINST THE ORDERS PASSED U/S 125 CR.P.C.} ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANSI CHAUHAN
Adv. TAPAN SINGH,PITAMBAR SINGH,PITAMBAR SINGH, ,AVNEESH KUMAR,NIKHIL KUSHWAHA,PITAMBAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
SACHIN KUMAR Advocate - SANJEEV SINGH, ,RINKESH RAWAT,SANJAY BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
FOR FINAL HEARING -40
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-07-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 08-06-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
| 04-05-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR FINAL HEARING -40 |
| 09-04-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
Orders
Case Summary: CRLR 457/2025 In this matrimonial dispute between Mansi Chauhan (wife) and Sachin Kumar (husband), the court ordered the husband to resume maintenance payments of Rs. 15,000/- monthly, which he had stopped after July 2025. Though reconciliation was attempted through counselling, the husband refused to reunite. The case is adjourned for one month for further proceedings on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRLR 457/2025 In this matrimonial dispute between Mansi Chauhan (wife) and Sachin Kumar (husband), the court ordered the husband to resume maintenance payments of Rs. 15,000/- monthly, which he had stopped after July 2025. Though reconciliation was attempted through counselling, the husband refused to reunite. The case is adjourned for one month for further proceedings on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts