MS RADICO KHAITAN LTD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB/525/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010107222026

Filing Number

WPMB/5605/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMB/525/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS RADICO KHAITAN LTD

    Adv. TARUN PANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.EXCISE COMMISSIONER

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    On 18.06.2026, the court ordered that WPMB No. 525/2026 filed by M/s Radico Khaitan Ltd. against the State of Uttarakhand be laid before a different bench, with Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta recusing himself. The case was reassigned to ensure impartiality by obtaining a nomination from the Chief Justice on the administrative side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMB/525/2026

casestatus.in Summary

On 18.06.2026, the court ordered that WPMB No. 525/2026 filed by M/s Radico Khaitan Ltd. against the State of Uttarakhand be laid before a different bench, with Chief Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta recusing himself. The case was reassigned to ensure impartiality by obtaining a nomination from the Chief Justice on the administrative side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case