ANUPAM SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB/523/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010107212026
Filing Number
WPMB/5604/2026
Filing Date
16-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMB/523/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
WRIT PETITION RELATING TO RECOVERY ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANUPAM SHARMA
Adv. VISHWA PRAKASH BAHUGUNA,SAIF HAMEED,SAIF HAMEED, ,SAIF HAMEED
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DIRECTOR GENERAL MEDICAL EDUCATION
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DIRECTOR GENERAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.PRINCIPAL VEER CHANDRA SINGH GARHWALI
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
7.TEHSILDAR
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: WPMB/523/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of Anupam Sharma's petition challenging bond violation recovery proceedings (Rs. 36,16,047/-) by directing authorities to consider his representation for remote area service within three weeks. The court held that since the petitioner expressed willingness to fulfill the bond's service conditions, ongoing recovery proceedings should not prevent consideration of his representation; if accepted, recovery would be automatically quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
16-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/523/2026
Case Summary: WPMB/523/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of Anupam Sharma's petition challenging bond violation recovery proceedings (Rs. 36,16,047/-) by directing authorities to consider his representation for remote area service within three weeks. The court held that since the petitioner expressed willingness to fulfill the bond's service conditions, ongoing recovery proceedings should not prevent consideration of his representation; if accepted, recovery would be automatically quashed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts