DEEPAK SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1150/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65/62,74,75. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010107132026

Filing Number

WPCRL/5112/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1150/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65/62,74,75
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 9/10,11/12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK SHARMA

    Adv. ABHISHEK JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.RANJANA SHARMA ALIAS RANJANA DEVI

    Adv. Reema Rana

  4. 4.TAMANNA SHARMA

    Adv. Reema Rana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The court quashed FIR No. 0139 against Deepak Sharma for sending obscene WhatsApp messages to his wife's 22-year-old daughter, after the complainants (wife and daughter) voluntarily entered into a compromise settlement and stated they no longer wished to pursue criminal proceedings. The court found the conviction possibility remote, the dispute purely domestic, and held that continuing proceedings would amount to abuse of process, thus acquitting the petitioner and ordering his immediate release from judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court quashed FIR No. 0139 against Deepak Sharma for sending obscene WhatsApp messages to his wife's 22-year-old daughter, after the complainants (wife and daughter) voluntarily entered into a compromise settlement and stated they no longer wished to pursue criminal proceedings. The court found the conviction possibility remote, the dispute purely domestic, and held that continuing proceedings would amount to abuse of process, thus acquitting the petitioner and ordering his immediate release from judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case