SAMADH ALIAS SAMU ABDUL ALIAS AMAN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1148/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),351(2),352. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010107012026

Filing Number

WPCRL/5106/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1148/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMADH ALIAS SAMU ABDUL ALIAS AMAN

    Adv. AKSHAY PRADHAN,PRAVEEN TOMAR,PRAVEEN TOMAR, ,PRAVEEN TOMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.SOMPAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL 1148/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned; interim protection granted. The petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 0050/2026 (involving land sale fraud allegations of ₹9.6 crore) was not dismissed. Instead, notice was issued to respondent No. 3 returnable within four weeks. As interim relief, the petitioner was granted protection from arrest provided he cooperates with investigation and appears before the Investigating Officer as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL 1148/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned; interim protection granted. The petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 0050/2026 (involving land sale fraud allegations of ₹9.6 crore) was not dismissed. Instead, notice was issued to respondent No. 3 returnable within four weeks. As interim relief, the petitioner was granted protection from arrest provided he cooperates with investigation and appears before the Investigating Officer as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case