DAMYANTI DHARAMSHAKTU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1616/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th August 2026.
CNR: UKHC010106792026
Filing Number
WPSS/5588/2026
Filing Date
16-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1616/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DAMYANTI DHARAMSHAKTU
Adv. AMAR MURTI SHUKLA,ANAND SINGH,ANAND SINGH, ,ANAND SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
24-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Aug-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPSS 1616/2026 Damyanti Dharamshaktu challenged a transfer order dated 10.06.2026 from Takula to Khatima District, arguing that at age 57, she was exempt from transfer under Section 7(d)(i) of the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public Servants Act, 2017. The court granted a stay on the impugned transfer order and adjourned the case to 24.08.2026, directing the State to file a counter affidavit or consider withdrawing the order given the apparent statutory violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1616/2026
Case Summary: WPSS 1616/2026 Damyanti Dharamshaktu challenged a transfer order dated 10.06.2026 from Takula to Khatima District, arguing that at age 57, she was exempt from transfer under Section 7(d)(i) of the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public Servants Act, 2017. The court granted a stay on the impugned transfer order and adjourned the case to 24.08.2026, directing the State to file a counter affidavit or consider withdrawing the order given the apparent statutory violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts