SAURAV TEWARI vs LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA Advocate - RAVI BISHT — WPMS/1889/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010106332026

Filing Number

WPMS/5573/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1889/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURAV TEWARI

    Adv. DUSHYANT MAINALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA Advocate - RAVI BISHT

  2. 2.SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER LIC

    Adv. RAVI BISHT

  3. 3.BRANCH MANAGER LIC

    Adv. RAVI BISHT

  4. 4.UTTARAKHAND STATE RURAL LIVELIHOOD MISSION THORUGH CEO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition filed by LIC Development Officer Saurav Tewari challenging a circular restricting Bima Sakhi sponsorship to local branch field supervisors. The court found the restriction justified as an inter-departmental communication aligned with State Rural Livelihood Mission directives for gram panchayat-level engagement. The petitioner was permitted to approach the Grievance Redressal Cell with his contentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -260

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1889/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition filed by LIC Development Officer Saurav Tewari challenging a circular restricting Bima Sakhi sponsorship to local branch field supervisors. The court found the restriction justified as an inter-departmental communication aligned with State Rural Livelihood Mission directives for gram panchayat-level engagement. The petitioner was permitted to approach the Grievance Redressal Cell with his contentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case