DURGESH SHARMA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1135/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 105. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.

Next hearing 28-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010105832026

Filing Number

WPCRL/5049/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1135/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 105

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURGESH SHARMA

    Adv. JITENDRA CHAUDHARY,NAVNEET SINGH,NAVNEET SINGH, ,NAVNEET SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.S.I. MANOJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. 28-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    WPCRL 1135/2026 - Summary Durgesh Sharma, a Finance Manager at M&M Logistic Solutions (Amazon partner), sought quashing of FIR No. 0195/2026 under Section 105 BNS 2023 for a warehouse fire. Claiming false implication and no role in warehouse supervision, Sharma argued the fire resulted from caretaker negligence in charging e-bikes. The court admitted the petition, granted the State four weeks to file counter-affidavit, and directed that investigation continue but Sharma shall not be arrested provided he cooperates. Case listed for 28.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPCRL 1135/2026 - Summary Durgesh Sharma, a Finance Manager at M&M Logistic Solutions (Amazon partner), sought quashing of FIR No. 0195/2026 under Section 105 BNS 2023 for a warehouse fire. Claiming false implication and no role in warehouse supervision, Sharma argued the fire resulted from caretaker negligence in charging e-bikes. The court admitted the petition, granted the State four weeks to file counter-affidavit, and directed that investigation continue but Sharma shall not be arrested provided he cooperates. Case listed for 28.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case