RAMESH KUMAR CHADDHA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1874/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010105652026

Filing Number

WPMS/5524/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1874/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH KUMAR CHADDHA

    Adv. AKSHAT BANSAL,ATUL KUMAR BANSAL,ATUL KUMAR BANSAL, ,ATUL KUMAR BANSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.YES BANK LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1874/2026 The court dismissed petitioner Ramesh Kumar Chaddha's writ petition challenging a SARFAESI Act Section 14 notice issued by the Additional District Magistrate of Udham Singh Nagar. The petitioner contested that the Additional District Magistrate lacked competency to pass such orders, arguing only the District Magistrate could do so. The court rejected this contention, relying on the Supreme Court's authoritative judgment in *R.D. Jain and Company v. Capital First Limited* (2023), which held that "District Magistrate" under Section 14 includes Additional District Magistrates, as such orders are ministerial steps to facilitate secured creditor possession and require expeditious processing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -260

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1874/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1874/2026 The court dismissed petitioner Ramesh Kumar Chaddha's writ petition challenging a SARFAESI Act Section 14 notice issued by the Additional District Magistrate of Udham Singh Nagar. The petitioner contested that the Additional District Magistrate lacked competency to pass such orders, arguing only the District Magistrate could do so. The court rejected this contention, relying on the Supreme Court's authoritative judgment in *R.D. Jain and Company v. Capital First Limited* (2023), which held that "District Magistrate" under Section 14 includes Additional District Magistrates, as such orders are ministerial steps to facilitate secured creditor possession and require expeditious processing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case