SHAFEEK AHMAD AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1133/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),351(3),352. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010105462026
Filing Number
WPCRL/5034/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1133/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAFEEK AHMAD AND ORS
Adv. HARSH VARDHAN DHANIK,JUNAID ALAM,JUNAID ALAM, ,JUNAID ALAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.S.H.O.
Adv. G.A.
-
3.NAEEM AHMAD
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: WPCRL No.1133/2026 The writ petition filed by Shafeek Ahmad and others seeking quashing of FIR No.0153/2026 (registered under BNS 2023 Sections 137(2), 351(3), and 352 at Police Station Kunda) was admitted by the court. The FIR alleged the petitioners enticed away the complainant's daughter and instigated her to leave home with valuables worth ₹1,50,000. The court granted interim protection to the petitioners by directing they shall not be arrested till the next hearing, provided they cooperate with the ongoing investigation. Notice was issued to the respondent (the daughter), and the case was adjourned for further hearing after service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCRL/1133/2026
Case Summary: WPCRL No.1133/2026 The writ petition filed by Shafeek Ahmad and others seeking quashing of FIR No.0153/2026 (registered under BNS 2023 Sections 137(2), 351(3), and 352 at Police Station Kunda) was admitted by the court. The FIR alleged the petitioners enticed away the complainant's daughter and instigated her to leave home with valuables worth ₹1,50,000. The court granted interim protection to the petitioners by directing they shall not be arrested till the next hearing, provided they cooperate with the ongoing investigation. Notice was issued to the respondent (the daughter), and the case was adjourned for further hearing after service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts