MAMTA PANT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSB/370/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010105322026
Filing Number
WPSS/5499/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSB/370/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAMTA PANT
Adv. SHIVANGI GANGWAR,MANISH LOHANI,MANISH LOHANI, ,MANISH LOHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT
-
6.SELECTION COMMITTEE
-
7.RAMKRISHNA POKHRIYAL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: WPSB/370/2026 In this Uttarakhand High Court petition filed by Mamta Pant against the State of Uttarakhand and others (18.06.2026), the court issued notice to respondents 5-7 via registered post and adjourned the case for four weeks. The respondents were directed to file a counter affidavit within the interim period. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSB/370/2026
Case Summary: WPSB/370/2026 In this Uttarakhand High Court petition filed by Mamta Pant against the State of Uttarakhand and others (18.06.2026), the court issued notice to respondents 5-7 via registered post and adjourned the case for four weeks. The respondents were directed to file a counter affidavit within the interim period. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts