SANGEETA PETWAL vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN — WPMS/1858/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010105192026

Filing Number

WPMS/5492/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1858/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGEETA PETWAL

    Adv. ADITYA SINGH,LOCHAN SAH,LOCHAN SAH, ,LOCHAN SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.MADHU THAPA

  4. 4.BHAGWAN SINGH

  5. 5.SIDDHANT CHHETRI

  6. 6.RETIRED COLONEL ANUPAM CHHETRI

  7. 7.SUNIL BENJWAL

  8. 8.NAVIN SINGH PHARSWAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's application for urgent hearing during summer vacation. The court found no exceptional urgency warranting vacation hearing but directed the trial court to consider the petitioner's prayer for temporary injunction within 15 days of court reopening on 01.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1858/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's application for urgent hearing during summer vacation. The court found no exceptional urgency warranting vacation hearing but directed the trial court to consider the petitioner's prayer for temporary injunction within 15 days of court reopening on 01.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case