AKASH KUMAR vs UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Advocate - PANKAJ MIGLANI — WPSS/1585/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010104932026

Filing Number

WPSS/5473/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1585/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH KUMAR

    Adv. BRAHM DEV,SUMIT JOSHI,SUMIT JOSHI, ,SUMIT JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Advocate - PANKAJ MIGLANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Akash Kumar's writ petition challenging the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission's October 26, 2024 notification that converted the first leg examination from a marks-bearing test to a qualifying-only test for the Additional Private Secretary position. The court found no prejudice to the petitioner since he had already qualified in the screening test and proceeded to the second leg examination, rendering the challenge unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1585/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Akash Kumar's writ petition challenging the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission's October 26, 2024 notification that converted the first leg examination from a marks-bearing test to a qualifying-only test for the Additional Private Secretary position. The court found no prejudice to the petitioner since he had already qualified in the screening test and proceeded to the second leg examination, rendering the challenge unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case