LAKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS SHAMU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/1210/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010104852025
Filing Number
BA1/5288/2025
Filing Date
09-07-2025
Registration No
BA1/1210/2025
Registration Date
09-07-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS SHAMU
Adv. SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY,MANI KUMAR,MANI KUMAR, ,GEETANJALI DHAMI,MANI KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
ORDER MATTERS -17
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 26-02-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 12-02-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 20-02-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
| 08-01-2026 | BAIL ORDER MATTERS (AFTER FRESH) -254 |
Orders
The court granted bail to applicant Lakhwinder Singh, charged under Section 64 BNS and Sections 5-6 POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor, finding the prosecution's case weak. The court reasoned that the medical evidence (old, healed hymen rupture, no body injuries, no live spermatozoa despite 48-hour examination) contradicted the rape allegation, and the eye-witness statement denied the victim's version. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to applicant Lakhwinder Singh, charged under Section 64 BNS and Sections 5-6 POCSO Act for alleged rape of a minor, finding the prosecution's case weak. The court reasoned that the medical evidence (old, healed hymen rupture, no body injuries, no live spermatozoa despite 48-hour examination) contradicted the rape allegation, and the eye-witness statement denied the victim's version. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts