REKHA MEHTA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/1127/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010104822026

Filing Number

WPCRL/5015/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/1127/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REKHA MEHTA

    Adv. TARUN PRAKASH SINGH TAKULI

  2. 2.VIJAY ARYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. GA.

  4. 4.CHAUKI INCHARGE

  5. 5.SRI HAYAT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court granted protection to two adult petitioners, Rekha Mehta and Vijay Arya, who sought to marry but faced threats from family members. The court directed the local police to assess any threat to their safety and provide necessary protection, while also summoning and counseling any persons opposing their marriage to prevent coercion or harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  5. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/1127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted protection to two adult petitioners, Rekha Mehta and Vijay Arya, who sought to marry but faced threats from family members. The court directed the local police to assess any threat to their safety and provide necessary protection, while also summoning and counseling any persons opposing their marriage to prevent coercion or harassment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case