BAHADUR SINGH RAWAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/1583/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010104762026
Filing Number
WPSS/5461/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPSS/1583/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
REGULARIZATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAHADUR SINGH RAWAL
Adv. RAVEENDRA SINGH BISHT,RAMESH NAINWAL,RAMESH NAINWAL, ,RAMESH NAINWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DIRECTOR GENERAL
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.UTTARAKHAND ORGANIC COMMODITIES BOARD
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
-
4.MANAGING DIRECTOR
Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of five consolidated writ petitions filed by contractual employees (including Bahadur Singh Rawal) seeking regularization after 18-22 years of service. The court directed the Uttarakhand Organic Commodities Board to decide the petitioners' pending representations on merit within eight weeks, with detailed written reasons, applying the relevant 2013 and 2025 Regularization Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/1583/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of five consolidated writ petitions filed by contractual employees (including Bahadur Singh Rawal) seeking regularization after 18-22 years of service. The court directed the Uttarakhand Organic Commodities Board to decide the petitioners' pending representations on merit within eight weeks, with detailed written reasons, applying the relevant 2013 and 2025 Regularization Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts