MUKESH PHARTIYA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1844/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010104602026
Filing Number
WPMS/5449/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1844/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUKESH PHARTIYA
Adv. PANKAJ SEMWAL,DEEP CHANDRA JOSHI,DEEP CHANDRA JOSHI, ,DEEP CHANDRA JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.EXCISE COMMISSIONER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DISTRICT EXCISE OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/1844/2026 The court disposed of Mukesh Phartiya's writ petition seeking implementation of the Excise Commissioner's appellate order that had allowed his appeal against cancellation of his country liquor retail license. The District Magistrate, Almora had cancelled the license on 15.04.2026, but the Excise Commissioner overturned this on 25.04.2026; however, the petitioner was not permitted to operate despite the appellate order. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari directed the District Magistrate to consider and decide the petitioner's representation (dated 29.05.2026) in accordance with law within 10 days, citing the substantial license fee deposited by the petitioner as grounds for expedited resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1844/2026
Case Summary: WPMS/1844/2026 The court disposed of Mukesh Phartiya's writ petition seeking implementation of the Excise Commissioner's appellate order that had allowed his appeal against cancellation of his country liquor retail license. The District Magistrate, Almora had cancelled the license on 15.04.2026, but the Excise Commissioner overturned this on 25.04.2026; however, the petitioner was not permitted to operate despite the appellate order. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari directed the District Magistrate to consider and decide the petitioner's representation (dated 29.05.2026) in accordance with law within 10 days, citing the substantial license fee deposited by the petitioner as grounds for expedited resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts