NARESH CHANDRA CHAMOLI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/1251/2020

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010104052020

Filing Number

WPSS/4797/2020

Filing Date

15-Oct-2020

Registration No

WPSS/1251/2020

Registration Date

15-Oct-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MISC ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARESH CHANDRA CHAMOLI

    Adv. DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA,IRUM ZEBA,IRUM ZEBA, ,PALLAVI BAHUGUNA,RAFAT MUNIR ALI,IRUM ZEBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKAHND DEPARTMENT OF CULTURE SECRETARIAT COMPLEX SUBHASH

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.MEMBER SECRETARY/ OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY SPARSH GANGA BOARD DEHRADUN

  4. 4.DIRECTOR CULTURE DIRECTORTAE OF DEPARTMENT OF GOVT OF UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN

    Adv. C.S.C.

  5. 5.REGISTRAR FIRMS SOCIETIES AND CHITS/ DEPUTY REGISTRAR OFFICE AT 3/23 SHASTRI NAGAR HARIDWAR ROAD

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition but granted the petitioner liberty to submit a representation for re-engagement to the Secretary of Culture within one week, with a decision to be made within two months thereafter. The petitioner's absorption claim was rejected because the Sparsh Ganga Board dissolved in 2017 and a 2018 government order prohibits fresh contractual engagements without prior state permission, though the court acknowledged similar employees were later engaged in the Culture Directorate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  5. 11-Aug-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  6. 10-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  7. 10-Jun-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  8. 06-Mar-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  9. 08-Oct-2024

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  10. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  11. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  12. 19-Oct-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

  13. 25-May-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

  14. 25-May-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

  15. 25-May-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  16. 03-Jan-2023

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  17. 19-Dec-2022

    Orders On Applications (After Fresh) -23

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  18. 17-Dec-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  19. 07-Dec-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  20. 29-Dec-2020

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh

  21. 27-Nov-2020

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh

  22. 16-Oct-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF

  23. 16-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 15-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1251/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition but granted the petitioner liberty to submit a representation for re-engagement to the Secretary of Culture within one week, with a decision to be made within two months thereafter. The petitioner's absorption claim was rejected because the Sparsh Ganga Board dissolved in 2017 and a 2018 government order prohibits fresh contractual engagements without prior state permission, though the court acknowledged similar employees were later engaged in the Culture Directorate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case