KANWAR PAL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/225/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)/61(2). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010103932026

Filing Number

ABA/4974/2026

Filing Date

12-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABA/225/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)/61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANWAR PAL SINGH

    Adv. PANKAJ MIGLANI,LALIT MIGLANI,LALIT MIGLANI, ,LALIT MIGLANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHO (Station House Officer)

    Adv. G.A.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/225/2026 Kanwar Pal Singh sought anticipatory bail in a fraud case (FIR No. 69/2025) involving alleged offences under BNS 2023 Sections 318(4)/61(2). The court granted interim anticipatory bail, ordering his release on personal bond with two sureties if arrested, subject to conditions requiring cooperation with investigation and no witness contact. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter-affidavit, with the matter listed thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/225/2026 Kanwar Pal Singh sought anticipatory bail in a fraud case (FIR No. 69/2025) involving alleged offences under BNS 2023 Sections 318(4)/61(2). The court granted interim anticipatory bail, ordering his release on personal bond with two sureties if arrested, subject to conditions requiring cooperation with investigation and no witness contact. The State was granted four weeks to file a counter-affidavit, with the matter listed thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case