RAJNEESH vs SANDEEP SHARMA — WPMS/1826/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010103792026

Filing Number

WPMS/5412/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1826/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJNEESH

    Adv. VINAY BHATT,MOHD SHAFY,MOHD SHAFY, ,MOHD SHAFY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS/1826/2026 Rajneesh filed a writ petition challenging the delay in consideration of his Temporary Injunction Application filed in Original Suit No. 01 of 2021, which had remained pending without decision for years. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of the petition with a directive to the trial court to decide the temporary injunction application within three months from the date of service of this order on the defendant, addressing the grievance of judicial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1826/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS/1826/2026 Rajneesh filed a writ petition challenging the delay in consideration of his Temporary Injunction Application filed in Original Suit No. 01 of 2021, which had remained pending without decision for years. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari disposed of the petition with a directive to the trial court to decide the temporary injunction application within three months from the date of service of this order on the defendant, addressing the grievance of judicial delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case