KIRTAN PAL vs SHISIR GUPTA — CLCON/345/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010103762026

Filing Number

CLCON/5409/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CLCON/345/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRTAN PAL

    Adv. AMREEN BANO,SPARSH GUPTA,SPARSH GUPTA, ,SPARSH GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHISIR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON /345/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Kirtan Pal's civil contempt petition against Shisir Gupta, finding no willful breach of the Court's November 19, 2025 order. The Court held that the respondent's May 18, 2026 decision on the petitioner's representation—granting Grade Pay of Rs.2800 and approving arrears payment pending budget receipt—constituted sufficient compliance with the earlier directive, despite actual payment remaining pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON /345/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Kirtan Pal's civil contempt petition against Shisir Gupta, finding no willful breach of the Court's November 19, 2025 order. The Court held that the respondent's May 18, 2026 decision on the petitioner's representation—granting Grade Pay of Rs.2800 and approving arrears payment pending budget receipt—constituted sufficient compliance with the earlier directive, despite actual payment remaining pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case