SHALINI GUPTA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPCRL/1117/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010103752026
Filing Number
WPCRL/4966/2026
Filing Date
11-06-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/1117/2026
Registration Date
11-06-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHALINI GUPTA
Adv. SURAIYA NAAZ
GAURAV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. G.A.
SHO (Station House Officer)
Adv. G.A.
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. G.A.
NEERAJ GUPTA
SMT. INDU GUPTA
NAVEEN GUPTA
HAPPY GUPTA
DEEPU GUPTA
KRISHNA GUPTA
DR. DAYAL SARAN
POOJA GUPTA
RAJU GUPTA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPCRL/1117/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted protection to Shalini Gupta and Gaurav Kumar, two majors of the same faith but different castes seeking to marry. The court found they have made out a case for protection of life and liberty, as they face continuous threats from the petitioner no. 1's family members opposing their inter-caste relationship. The court directed the Police Station Haldwani to assess threat perception and provide adequate protection, while summoning and counseling opposing family members to ensure no coercion or interference with the petitioners' proposed marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPCRL/1117/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted protection to Shalini Gupta and Gaurav Kumar, two majors of the same faith but different castes seeking to marry. The court found they have made out a case for protection of life and liberty, as they face continuous threats from the petitioner no. 1's family members opposing their inter-caste relationship. The court directed the Police Station Haldwani to assess threat perception and provide adequate protection, while summoning and counseling opposing family members to ensure no coercion or interference with the petitioners' proposed marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts