PRAVESH KUMAR ANAND vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/1330/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010103502026

Filing Number

C528/4953/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

C528/1330/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVESH KUMAR ANAND

    Adv. DEEPAK JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SIVAM DHEMAN

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case C528/1330/2026 Summary: The case involving petitioner Pravesh Kumar Anand against the State of Uttarakhand and Sivam Dheman was adjourned. Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal ordered the matter to be listed afresh on 18.06.2026, requiring the Secretary to the Development Authority (complainant) to remain present in court with complete records. The applicant's counsel was directed to serve a copy of the petition to the District Level Development Authority's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/1330/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case C528/1330/2026 Summary: The case involving petitioner Pravesh Kumar Anand against the State of Uttarakhand and Sivam Dheman was adjourned. Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal ordered the matter to be listed afresh on 18.06.2026, requiring the Secretary to the Development Authority (complainant) to remain present in court with complete records. The applicant's counsel was directed to serve a copy of the petition to the District Level Development Authority's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case